Bring It On!

The Ultimate Victim and a 21st Century Revolutionary

January 29th, 2006 | by steve |

*

Ya think, Cindy’s taking this whole, “I lost my son because he died after voluteering for the military, because Bush wanted oil, and my husband divorced me and I stand around crying like an idiot on the dirt road to Bush’s ranch” thing way too seriously.

Maybe she could fly to Iraq and stand next to al-Zarqawi?

I hope she does run for Feinstein’s spot. Maybe then people will finally see how fake she is.

I don’t know.

What a freaking Communist!!! Why is it all the weird ones are around Sacramento? Michael Newdow, Steve Pearcy, now Sheehan.

  1. 10 Responses to “The Ultimate Victim and a 21st Century Revolutionary”

  2. By OTTMANN on Jan 29, 2006 | Reply

    It’s really not too hard to figure out. Cindy is the mother for the all the liberal losers who love her idiocy because they identify with it and she makes them “feel” better.

    And you’re right, she is a communist as are most on the left. Her son has been rolling in his grave ever since she started this charade that mocks his memory and sacrifice.

    Cindy makes most people sick to their core.

  3. By jerseymcjones on Jan 30, 2006 | Reply

    You just called Hugo Chavez a communist terrorist?  You’re kidding, right?

    JMJ 

  4. By steve on Jan 30, 2006 | Reply

    Still looking for the word terrorist in my original post Jersey.  Typical liberal, making stuff up to fit their point.

  5. By The Bastard on Jan 30, 2006 | Reply

    Steve, I’m interested to know how she is a communist, how did you come to that conclusion? What has she done that makes her a communist? By definition is she a communist and how? Calling someone a cummunist just because they lean left is not enough in this case.

    That would be like me calling you a Nazi or a facist. It’s a bit of a stretch don’t you think? I for one know you are not but even still that would not allow me to call you either because you have not demonstrated the patterns associated with such groups.

    If you are calling her a communist because she is standing next to Hugo Chavez then that is a very shakey conclusion you draw. You would then have to say the same for Mr. Danger. He to stood next to him, he to had speaking engagments in his socialist country.

    So what exactly makes her a communist? 

  6. By jerseymcjones on Jan 30, 2006 | Reply

    Steve, did you not make analogy to Zarqawi?  I must be having a flashback….

    WoooOOOoooOOOooo…

    JMJ

     

  7. By steve on Jan 30, 2006 | Reply

    Uh… yeah flashback, that’s it.  So you are admitting Zarqawi is a terrorist now!  I see…  Never called him a terrorist but hey if someone from the left is going to call him that then, about freaking time.

    Bastard, don’t even try…  can you prove she’s on your side then?

  8. By jerseymcjones on Jan 30, 2006 | Reply

    Hey Steve, grasping at semantics today, huh?

    By the way, every lib I know refers to Zarqawi as a terrorist.

    Perhaps you should read more liberal stuff and open up your mind so you don’t look uninformed in educated circles.  ;)
    JMJ  

  9. By chasingdogma on Jan 30, 2006 | Reply

    I’m still clueless as to why right-wing America hates Hugo Chavez. He was democratically elected, no? I don’t hear the Venezuelan population complaining about him… is it the whole SOCIALIST ideal that you hate so much?

  10. By steve on Jan 30, 2006 | Reply

    I’m still clueless as to why left-wing America hates George Bush. He was democratically elected, no? I don’t hear the Republican population complaining about him… is it the whole Conservative ideal that you hate so much?

  11. By jerseymcjones on Jan 30, 2006 | Reply

    Bush is a Conservative?

    JMJ

Post a Comment