The Annoying Bumper Sticker
March 27th, 2006 | by steve |I saw this sticker again for the umpteenth time yesterday on the back of a SUV. The sticker says, “He’s Not My President”. A long with it were around 20 other stickers for various causes but mainly were directed at the war. This person obviously has a beef with our government and for all I know, since I was about a block from Steve Pearcy’s house, it was Pearcy himself. But I really wasn’t paying attention since I was on my way to the hardware store and had a one track mind on my new Ikea sink. Besides I am not one to harass somebody on the road because they have a sticker I disagree with. I keep my sanity in public. The “Not My President” sticker though, jumped out at me.
And then Pjordansr writes a nice post today. A few comments came after mine and well here’s where I have problem with the sticker.
“He’s not my President”.
I could have easily made the same statements about Clinton during his second term. I technically voted for him in 1992 instead of throwing my vote away on Perot. What was I doing? I know, I was 18, it was my first election… and I was young. I voted for Dole in 1996. Bush 2 in 2000 and 2004. The older I get the more I vote. I voted in the last “Special Election” in which a lot of Californians didn’t. Turn out was 48% last November, no matter what history says 48% is low in any election. Still leaders and special elections will come and go and I will be there voting.
And then you have a “He’s not my President” sticker on a car.
I voted for and against many other things as well in the past. I am always one of those who reads the damn ballot before I show up. I wanna make sure I make the correct decision when it comes to state propositions. I am sensitive when it comes to education bills since my wife is a teacher. I am curious when it comes to new laws that effect my life socially. I am always doing the research on new taxes, balanced budgets. Chances are someday some real powerful issues will come up for my vote and I will be there voting.
And then you have a “He’s not my President” sticker on a car.
I always vote against Boxer because I think she is a twit. I cannot believe she had the nerve to take on Rice who is a billion times smarter than she is. I’ve voted for Feinstein. These are the only Senators in my state that have won since I have been a voter. I haven’t had a real chance to vote for somebody different. Chances are someone will come up and take on one of these seats someday and I’ll be there voting.
And then you have a “He’s not my President” sticker on a car.
So what is it that I am really trying to say here? Well, I think you are entirely wrong to put a “He’s not my President” sticker on your car. Reason being… Boxer isn’t my senator since I didn’t vote for her. I hate her. I can’t stand her. The special election results? Well those decisions aren’t mine either right? All those ballot measures that I lose, those local mayorial candidates and city supervisors that I vote for that lose. They aren’t all mine either, right? Wrong… They are mine. Mr. Bush, unfortunately for some of you, is our President. Boxer and Feinstein are both my senators. The mayor is my mayor. We can’t always pick and choose what we want. If you really embrace our democracy and vote in every election, you must understand what I am saying. It’s all or nothing. Election day is the day we change it, as a society, not for our personal, emotional gain.
Teddy Roosevelt’s quote on this blog means a lot to many people. It means something to me as well. But there is much more to it than disagreeing with a President. As some of you know, my father was not born here. He was born in Germany right after WWII. Basically, a war refugee. My grandfather brought the family here in the 1950’s on a boat that took three weeks. He went right through the NYC port. There were no handouts except for that “sponsership” which brought him by Greyhound bus to San Jose. My Dad finally became a citizen officially in 2000. He was always here legally until then. I asked one day why he went through with it and did it, to become an American citizen. Answer: So he could vote. My father is a simple person. Worked hard all his life. Bought the house he wanted, drove the car he could afford and gave me and my brothers the best opportunities that were available to us. And all he wanted was to be a citizen. I remember in November when I asked him how it went for the California Special Election and he just said, “You win some and lose some. At least we can vote.” Next to his chair at home are stacks of books on Cuba, Castro and Che Guevara. Books on Vietnam. He didn’t vote in the 60’s, now he reads about what he missed. Every election day since he became “official” he’s attended. Voting to him puts one in control.
So sitting here and thinking about that sticker on that car and my father’s past really leads me to this. How can we say something is “not mine” when the system we contribute to, fight and defend, even cherish makes it ours, no matter the outcome, when it works like it should? Our first amendment lets us criticize it, tear it apart, call it monkey boy and whatever other offense name we can come up with but in the end our right to vote, our Democracy, still protects us from ourselves. Criticism is how we cope and entertain ourselves in bad times. Change, comes from us on Election Day.
(You can say all you want about wire tapping now, I am still right:)).
Sphere: Related Content







5 Responses to “The Annoying Bumper Sticker”
By Paul Watson, Cranky Brit on Mar 28, 2006 | Reply
Correct. The sticker should have said ‘I do not supprt the President’ or the President does not represent me’ but there is something visceral and satisfying about refusing to accept he’s coonected to you in some way. He is your President. Tony Blair is my Prime Minister. But that doesn’t mean I have to be happy about it, or give him a great deal of respect because of it.
By PhiloTBG on Mar 28, 2006 | Reply
I’m with Paul. He IS your president, as distasteful as that may be for many people. If you oppose Bush and his actions, I’ve always found it is more powerful to create a sense of ownership. He is MY president and his actions are MY problem. Pretending he isn’t your president doesn’t do anything than show that you don’t like Bush.
I think Bush will go down as one of the worst presidents in history. The only reason that that has any meaning at all is because he is my president, our president. There are a lot of bad people that aren’t my president (Hu Jintao, Charles Taylor, Alexander Lukashenko) - only George W. Bush is my president. I’ll do everything I can to get him removed from office before the natural expiration of his term, but until then, he’s my president.
By Liberal thinker on Mar 28, 2006 | Reply
Question: How do you know the driver of that car wasn’t Canadian or some other foreign national here for school or work?
Personally I like the bumper sticker “To: The World/ We are sorry!/ From: The other 50% of America”
And one other thing: Rice is smarter than who? She’s an intelligent woman I agree but she’s also not. She spent her academic career as an international relations scholar. She was a realist and was a somewhat well-known realist. I say was because she is now actively arguing liberal (in IR) positions. So, did she suddenly come to a realization that her previous career in academics was wrong? or did she sell herself to the Bush administration? I’m not sure she was smarter than Boxer before she joined this administration, personally they seem pretty equal competition, but her legacy will go down as being one of the biggest sell-outs in the IR field and will never be respected in that community again. That was pretty stupid.
By steve on Mar 28, 2006 | Reply
Um… because Canadians don’t pollute…
I still can’t figure out what you are trying to say about Rice other than you don’t like her.
By Liberal thinker on Mar 28, 2006 | Reply
No, I don’t like her. I don’t like the fact that she sold out. I didn’t like her ideas before she joined the administration but I liked her more when she had conviction. She spent years defending realism only to sell out. Now, she’s selling bad arguments for a good theory. That’s because she doesn’t understand or truly agree with the theory.
She’s intelligent but not that bright for 2 reasons. First, she spoiled her legacy by undermining all her academic work. Second, she doesn’t understand, or she ignores, history and theory. She has been integral in the failures of 9/11, the quagmire that is Iraq, the decline of world opinion towards the US, and a less safe America today. Listen to her testimony to the 9/11 commission. The theme to her testimony “that’s not my job.” Unless someone came to her and said “there will be an attack at this time, in this place, etc.” she ignored them. She was key in the selling of LIES to the U.S. public. Iraq and our many lies and statements concerning Iraq have caused a mistrust of America in many of our one time allies. Iraq has fuelled the fundamentalist muslim cause and trapped a huge portion of our soldiers and money, this makes our soldiers overseas and our people here less safe. This are all things Boxer realizes even while Rice keeps spinning the administrations lies. That’s why Rice isn’t smarter than Boxer.