Bin Laden is Dead?
September 23rd, 2006 | by Jersey McJones |It seems as though the world’s most notorious, most infamous, most famous, most wanted dead or alive, most loved, and most despised terrorist may well be dead.
The Seattle Post Intelligencer reports…
“The chief of al-Qaida was a victim of a severe typhoid crisis while in Pakistan on August 23, 2006,” the document says. His geographic isolation meant that medical assistance was impossible, the French report said, adding that his lower limbs were allegedly paralyzed.
The report further said Saudi security services had their first information on bin Laden’s alleged death on Sept. 4.
Apparently he contracted typhoid. It would ironically be a rather ignominious end to this gangster’s career, though it would be a blow to his enemies in that they would never have had the chance to catch or kill him themselves. One should be concerned, however, of the repercussions of his death. We may well see some tributary acts of terror in his name. We’d better be on alert for real as opposed to just playing with crayon colors.
JMJ
8 Responses to “Bin Laden is Dead?”
By ascap_scab on Sep 23, 2006 | Reply
That might make sense of Musharrif’s treaty with the Taliban in Warizistan.
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum/showthread.php?t=81710
Is this the “October surprize”??
By Dusty on Sep 23, 2006 | Reply
I thought Halloween was the October surprize
I don’t know what to think about this little tidbit of info on Binny. Unless someone produces a body, we have to assume its bs, wouldn’t you think?
By tos on Sep 25, 2006 | Reply
Oh the horror. The poor man was forced to hide away without any healthcare.
By Dusty on Sep 25, 2006 | Reply
Well Tos, he gets to join the 40 million Americans that don’t have any..bfd :p
By tos on Sep 26, 2006 | Reply
Wow what happened to Hillary’s plan of Universal Healthcare when Bill became president. They looked at the numbers and realized it would bankrupt the system or you and me.
By Dusty on Sep 26, 2006 | Reply
Um Tos, the republican-controlled congress blew it out of the water.
By tos on Sep 26, 2006 | Reply
So the republican controlled congress gets blamed for that but not for the balanced budget under Clinton.
Don’t worry if and when the democrats take control and they will work out where we still pay for healthcare and those that don’t will get it when they increase your income tax withholding to 75% instead of 50%.
By Dusty on Sep 26, 2006 | Reply
Tos, I didn’t place any blame, the congress wasn’t going to buy into the universal healthcare plan. Clinton and the congress worked hard to have 3 straight years surplus..both of them should be commended for that. It shows that on occasion both parties can work together for the common good.