I’m Supporting The Surge
January 24th, 2007 | by Ken Grandlund |For the second time in as many weeks, President Bush addressed the nation and orated at great lengths about the ‘way forward in Iraq.’ First, on January 10th, the president announced his decision, despite overwhelming concensus to the contrary, to increase the number of American troops in Iraq, escalate his warlike stance towards Iran, and seek to increase the permanent size of the American military.
“America will change our strategy to help the Iraqis carry out their campaign to put down sectarian violence and bring security to the people of Baghdad. This will require increasing American force levels. So I’ve committed more than 20,000 additional American troops to Iraq….
We’ll interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria. And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq….
We can begin by working together to increase the size of the active Army and Marine Corps, so that America has the Armed Forces we need for the 21st century.”
Bush’s plan was immediately rejected by a Democratically controlled Congress, a majority of the American public, a large contingent of world governments, former and current military commanders, most puppies and, of course, the baby Jesus. None the less, Bush stuck out his jaw and pressed forward. The surge was on, will of the people be damned.
In the 13 days that followed, Bush has made no indications that he is going to change his mind. Why should he? He is the Decider-in-Chief, after all. So, despite Congressional resolutions and pending legislation that would variously condemn, chastise, or curtail appropriations for new war outlay, Bush came forth in his State of the Union Address to reassert his administration’s plans for a broader Middle East conflict. Reiterating the themes he presented to the nation on January 10th, Bush told the assembled Congress and the American people that more troops were already being sent to Iraq…
“So we’re deploying reinforcements of more than 20,000 additional soldiers and Marines to Iraq.”
No more debate folks, they troops are on the way. Bring on the surge.
Americans have made it loud and clear to this president that they want American involvement in Iraq to come to an end. They have declared that ending the war in Iraq is at the top of their governmental “To Do” list. The president has told the American people to Shut The Fuck Up.
But the president didn’t stop with the war in Iraq in the SOTU adress. He also remembered to ratchet up the threats to Iran. In a thinly veiled attempt to deflect attention to his intentions, Bush reminded us all that his entry into Iraq was legal under a UN resolution…
“Americans can have confidence in the outcome of this struggle because we’re not in this struggle alone. We have a diplomatic strategy that is rallying the world to join in the fight against extremism. In Iraq, multinational forces are operating under a mandate from the United Nations.”
And in the next breath he declared that:
“The United Nations has imposed sanctions on Iran, and made it clear that the world will not allow the regime in Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons.”
Taken together with the recent build up of American naval power in the Persian Gulf and the rhetoric of the January 10th speech, it becomes more clear every day that Bush will expand his Middle East initiatives at the first opportunity, all the while claiming to seek a diplomatic solution. Just like before Iraq. Yet it is hard to engage in diplomacy when you refuse to speak to your adversary.
Make no mistake. The surge is on. And it may well not stop in Baghdad.
Bush has finally and very overtly changed the game of American politics. He has unilaterally declared himself unstoppable. He has thrown off the constitutional shackles imposed upon the Executive Branch repeatedly over the years, but has managed to stay out ahead by obstinance and obfuscation. But now he has done something even more bold. He has denied the will of the people he professes to serve, he has ignored the masses who he purports to hold dear. He has donned the rosiest of all rose colored glasses. He is an island unto himself. And that, my friends, is not what the American president is supposed to be.
So let me just say that I too support a surge!
I support a surge of elected officials demanding investigations into this administration’s covert and extralegal shenanigans.
I support a surge in politicians jumping out of the president’s sinking lifeboat of a party and climbing onboard the USS Sanity.
I support a surge in honest, hard-working Americans protesting online and in the streets against this president and his attempts to embroil this country’s future generations in unending warfare based on fabricated evidence and historical mythology.
I support a surge in scientists condemning the president’s anti-science agenda’s and bringing forth widely accepted evidence to counteract the president’s hired pseudo-scientific spin doctors.
I support a surge in religious leaders condemning the very unChristian antics of this, the Born-Again, Evangelical President.
In short, I support an overwhelming surge against this president, his policies, and his administration hacks who perpetuate this assault on American integrity and security.
I’m supporting the surge. Just not the same one Bush is supporting. On second thought, maybe it’s a purge I should be supporting.
[tag]SOTU, Surge, Iraq, Iran, Bush, War[/tag]
(cross posted at Common Sense)
Sphere: Related Content







12 Responses to “I’m Supporting The Surge”
By tammara on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
i’m in your surge too.
By Ann on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
Me too! And the sooner the better.
By Tom Baker on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
PURGE PURGE PURGE!!!
By Jersey McJones on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
I’m for purge.
JMJ
By landcomm1 on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
Purging has medical and physical connotations which seem appropriate here. I for one would be happy for our nation to void George W. Bush from the bowels of our government!
By Gonnuts on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
As I watched bush walk into Congress being greeted cordially by all those in view I had to wonder why not one of the so-called representatives of the people wouldn’t at least turn their backs on this pretender, or make a public show of just walking out.
Next I wondered if any of the so-called representatives were aware of the evidence that is so easily available on sights like Belowgroundsurface.org, 9/11Thruth.org, Scholarsfor9/11 truth.org and more that raise serious questions about what really happened on September 11, 2001. Did any one of them now know what many are convinced was a deliberate attack against this country, not by so-called terrorists, but elements within our own government?
I’ve been wondering since 9/11/01 how so many people could have watched WTCB#7, a 100% heavily fortified steel building, which wasn’t hit by a plane and had minimal damage, simply fall into it’s own foot-print at free-fall speed and not ask how this was possible? Why hasn’t anyone in the MSM asked? Why didn’t the 9/11 Commission ask? And this is just one of the hundreds of questions not answered from that day.
We’ve been had folks. this whole government is a fraud as long as we allow this murderer-in-chief and all those that still live in a state of denial about the events of 9/11 to simply except the MSM’s spin and the so-called “official” version of these events.
By Lazy Iguana on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
Nobody turned their back or walked out because they do not have to. The Republicans lost their majority. The Democrats no longer have to resort to “stunts” in order to get their say, or even be heard. THEY can “turn their backs” later, with resolutions and investigations.
I do not believe the wild 9-11 conspiracy theories. WTC#9 fell because it did. The foundation was probably damaged even if the parts of the building above ground looked fine. I call it “The Florida sink hole” effect. Create an empty space underground, and bad things happen.
But the BIGGEST hole in the vast 9-11 conspiracy theory is the amount of people it would have taken to pull it off. Plant explosives in the towers? It would have taken a team of people to do this. Specialized people who knew EXACTLY what they were doing. Beams would need to be cut and stuff. Holes would have to be drilled. Cables would have to be strung. Have you ever seen a building rigged to implode up close? I have, from my boat in Miami. I could not get close on foot but the building was right on the water. The walls were cut away, and the support beams were exposed. Steel tensioned cables were all over the place like a spider web. Support beams were notched to weaken them. Holes were drilled in concrete to plant explosives. It took weeks to rig the building, and the work was not something that could be hidden. The work area had to be gutted. And all this happened in a building occupied 24 hours a day without anyone noticing? Where did they find the demolition ninjas to pull that off? Navy SEALS could not pull that off!
Do you really think Chimpy and company could have pulled that off? It would dwarf the fake moon landing, or even aliens in Area 51! Thousands would have to be involved, and Bush would be the “mastermind”?!?! He could not mastermind his way out of a wet paper sack
I think you are giving the man far too much credit here.
By Jet Netwal on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
Purge the scourge!
By liberal vet on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
Just some minor points from a minor person in a minor part of our land. The really frightening thing is the children of Iraq are being left fatherless. PTSD in children is rampant in Iraq and there is no way to stop it. In essence our beloved leader is creating a cadre of terrorists. I believe now more than ever Congress should impeach him and stop him from further eroding our democratic principles. How many more must die to serve Bush’s already inflated ego? LV
By icoman on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
Somebody please tell this bimbo that in order to achieve victory you must be fighting an enemy with a leader who can surrender. This is not the case in Iraq. There is near total chaos. It is totally impossible to think that some happy day may come and they will all give up and lay down their arms. That’s crazy. Instead, we have created a whole generation of Muslim finatics that will hold a vendetta against the U.S. for decades to come.
“If you are not aware of the current methods and techniques being used today to control people’s minds, then your mind is probably being controlled.”
By steve on Jan 24, 2007 | Reply
I think my son Elijah just surged in his diaper…