That’s (Mass) Entertainment
January 29th, 2007 | by Ken Grandlund |As the father of a young child, I am often dismayed at what passes for family entertainment these days, at least insofar as the mass media is concerned. Finding television shows that are not laced with violence, gratuitous sexual innuendo, foul language or rude behavior is almost impossible. Listening to the radio in the car is always a crapshoot too, especially when your musical preferences extend beyond classical, jazz, or opera. Disc jockeys seeking to gain the highest ratings go to the edge of the envelope with their antics and even the commercials can be over the top. The movie industry’s rating system is increasingly meaningless with each passing year as more and more on screen behavior becomes acceptable. And on top of that, video games, once a light-hearted entertainment option for kids (remember Pac Man or Centipede or even Pong?), have turned to criminality as the main theme for their latest releases.
Yet in an increasingly expensive society, where trips to the museum or sporting event or theme park can set families back a hundred bucks or more, movies, television, music, and video games are becoming the cheapest source of entertainment for many families. And with parents spending more time working than with their kids, children are increasingly being nurtured by the glowing boxes in our living rooms and bedrooms. We are easily into our second, if not our third television generation, and the effects on our society could only be described as dismal. Children become desensitized to violence before they even know what violence really is. They become entranced with physical appearance and relationships before they can even properly bathe themselves without help. They become obsessively materialistic before they can appreciate the value of money. And they have a difficult time differentiating between reality and fantasy. Today’s children grow up in a world full of promise and technological advancement, yet all we seem to be offering them is the same kind of entertainment enjoyed by ancient civilizations: gladiator-like violence, rapacious sexual play acting, and extreme caricatures acting in stereotypical, but unrealistic, manners.
Art, they say, is just a reflection of life. But what happens when the reflection is turned back upon itself? What then? Entertainment executives, when pressed about “family entertainment” often exclaim that there are plenty of options for parents and kids, and that no one is forcing people to watch, listen, or play with their products. And to some degree they are exactly right. But they also say that they only give the public what the public wants, and this is where their disingenuousness shows through clearly. In reality, the public gets what they executives think will get them the most return on their investment, either through commercial advertising, merchandising efforts, or direct sales. And the public, for the most part, reinforces this perception by continuing to consume all that they have to offer. But, again, if all that is offered is of the same ilk, what real choice does a consumer have?
Unlike most denouncements of the entertainment industry though, this is not a call for government regulation or censorship. This is a call for common sense. It is a call to parents and entertainment executives alike. For though it is hard to evidence with hard facts, it seems obvious that there must be a direct correlation between the attitudes and actions of our society and the things we see or do for entertainment. It is easiest to perceive in children, and unchecked or unseen, the things we learn as kids shape who we become as adults. Children are mimickers, it is how they learn what is and what is not acceptable. They see someone act a certain way and they emulate that behavior. They have no innate concept of right or wrong until we teach them. Yet the insidiousness of today’s mass entertainment is that it reinforces socially negative behavior through its subtleties. Seemingly innocuous programs for kids often depict parents and adults as aloof providers who offer little real guidance and nary a scrap of discipline while the kids are know-it-all super heroes, capable of solving any problem in just under thirty minutes. After weeks and weeks of ingesting this kind of fantasy, children unconsciously adopt the behaviors of their television role models, creating havoc in the home and school and disrespecting their parents and teachers. And these are the least harmful attitudes they adopt.
So what should be done? After all, we don’t want entertainment to be exactly like reality since the whole point of entertainment is to forget for a while our own complicated lives. And certainly, we shouldn’t prevent adults from viewing or enjoying violent or sexy cinema if that is their choice. In truth, I enjoy a good war film, suspense mystery, or lusty love story from time to time. I listen to rock and roll music as well as love songs. But as an adult, I have both the life experience to understand what I am seeing or hearing and the established sense of behavior to know the difference between acceptable and unacceptable actions. As a parent, I have to recognize that my child does not have these same attributes, yet, and it is my job, not mass media’s, to teach them.
I am a big proponent in turning off the television. As parents, we need to engage our kids more often than our busy lives sometimes seem to allow. If there needs to be censorship of modern mass media, it is first and foremost our jobs to be the censors for our families. Parents need to remember that children will not raise themselves, at least not in a socially responsible manner, and that the decision to become a parent means that life does not carry on as before. Sacrifice of our own personal desires are a necessary element of raising children, which sometimes means missing our favorite sit-com and reading to our kids. Or playing a board game. Or taking walks around the neighborhood. Or staring up at the stars. If you don’t feel comfortable listening to sex jokes and fart noises with a four year old, turn off the TV and do something else. If you don’t want your ten-year-old thinking that girls must be thin, blond, and sexy to be beautiful, turn off the TV and talk to your kids about individual self worth. If your 13 year old seems obsessed with war and weaponry, don’t buy the newest shoot-em up video game and then leave him in his room for all hours to master the skills of street killing. Use some common sense.
This is the only effective means of getting mass media to change the menu of offerings. By turning off the television, by not buying the games, by going to the park instead of the movie theater, parents can send a more effective message to the entertainment industry. By not supporting what they have to offer, they will be forced to give us something else or go out of business. PBS is perhaps the last bastion of quality children’s television, yet the politicians and the corporate broadcasters want to kill it off. This should tell us something about their true motives, since PBS is also non-commercial and tax exempt.
The industry has proven to be ineffective at controlling themselves. Government has no role in legislating entertainment, except when it crosses the line into illegality. Therefore, it is up to us to call for change. It is not a push to eliminate the violence or sex from entertainment altogether. It is a call for industry movers and shakers to dedicate themselves to creating family movies and programs that are both fun and responsible. It is a call for parents to be more parental and more involved with their kid’s entertainment choices. And it is a call for families to spend more time doing things together and relying less on mass media to teach and entertain us.
[tag]mass+media, entertainment, television, society[/tag]
(originally posted at Common Sense)
Sphere: Related Content







8 Responses to “That’s (Mass) Entertainment”
By tos on Jan 29, 2007 | Reply
Great post Ken. It’s a tough call because kids also have the influence of other kids as well. It is more difficult for today’s parents of young children and I am glad I am past that stage. I don’t know what the answer is but I can imagine how difficult it must be. I always worked when my daughter was young which is quite a while ago. I was fortunate eough to have my mom to help out.
I understand why 2 people have to work ,the high cost of education,and the luxuries that kids want today like 100.00 sneakers,cell phones,computers,all the activities they are in,and all the birthday parties they are required to attend and the high cost of property taxes and utilities.
I have a friend who’s daughter’s sweet sixteen party cost them 9,000. That is just insane. What ever happened to taking some of the kid’s friends out to dinner or just a party at the house as we did for our daughter and as I did when I was 16.
The media influence does have alot to do with today’s “expensive taste”. Alot of people live beyond their means and how do you deny your child when all the rest of the kids are doing it. Today’s society doesn’t want to do “without”.
As far as violence and sex on TV I agree some of those things need to be toned down,alot.
And why are parents so afraid to say no today. This guy on our bowling league has a 19 year old brother in law who deosn’t work or go to school just sits in front of the computer all day and his single mother cannot handle him. That is another problem the deterioration of families. The same friend that spent all that money on the sweet 16 party said out of all her daughters’ friends which she has many only her and one other friend has a 2 parent household.
By SteveIL on Jan 29, 2007 | Reply
Ken,
I agree with tos; great post.
By Tom Baker on Jan 29, 2007 | Reply
Ken good post. However, i think you do short shrift to the amount of family entertainment out there. Sure there are violent video games, but there are also fantastic family friendly games out there like Viva Pinata or Wii Sports etc that are fun and non-violent, non-sexual etc.
TV has certainly become more crass, but cable and micro-targeted channels have also increased good stuff for kids as well. I mean when you and I were kids, we had what- Sesame Street and Mr Rodgers? Maybe the Electric Company and Cpt. Kangaroo? Now you have whole channels like Noggin, Nick Gas and PBS Kidsthat program 24 hours a day of kid friendly, educational type of stuff. Even the channels like Disney and Nickelodeon (while certainly not educational in most ways) are a fairly safe haven for tweens.
Heck even for adults, you have The Food Network, Home and garden, The History Channel, the Discovery Channel, National Geographic, etc etc etc to stimulate the mind. As a science and food geek, I can spend 24 hours a day watching nothing but that stuff and still not see it all.
Music is all over the board, but as an avid music fan, I have to say the pop music from our generation was all about getting laid, getting wild or getting your heart stomped on. Now we have the whole gangsta thing which isn’t my cup of tea, but is it really that much different?
Movies are the same. Lots of violetn sexual crap (and violent, sexual masterpieces) but my parents never had the luxury of so many family friendly movies. In the last month we’ve seen A Night at the Museum, Charlotte’s Web, Happily Never After, Arthur and the Invisibles (2x) plus your standard Christmas holiday fair. Not all of them were brilliant, but they were safe and funny for my 6 year old.
All of this is to point out that while we have certainly gone to the extremes in some ways, the market really is providing alternatives to people who want them. we can;t jusge things the way we did in the 70’s 80’s or even early 90’s because technology has put the whole world at your fingertips. If you want something, whether it’s hard core porn or sugary sweet educational material, it’s there. Isn’t that the best of both worlds?
By Paul Merda on Jan 30, 2007 | Reply
Agreed Ken, it is up to the parents to provide guidance for their children. I also agree with Tom in that there are plenty of great things for kids too.
Hell, we have 5 (yes five) TV’s in our house. One of them is always going and yet, my children would rather do a million other things than watch TV. I think it is one of those forbidden things, if try to stop kids from wathcing this or that, they will seek it out, leave it all in the open and they ignore it and do something else… My 3 and 5 year old recently watched King King (recent version), Pirates of the Carinbean II and last year their favorite was Van Helsing. I am sure some people are going to think I’m crazy for letting them watch that stuff, but hey, they aren’t afraid of shit now…not the dark, not some mysterious boogey-man, nothin’.
By Tom Baker on Jan 30, 2007 | Reply
You wait till I’m up there ins a few weeks pal, I’ll scare em
By ken grandlund on Jan 30, 2007 | Reply
Tom-
You are right, of course, that there is a fair amount of family contentr if you look. I originally wrote this when my daughter was around 5, and have found that as she ages, so too does my own tolerance for programming that is ‘on the line.’ By that I mean ‘family comedies’ that are laced with sexual inuendo…all fine fare for adults and older kids, but kind of made me cringe when I thought I was watching something ‘okay’ and had to wade through sexual content, however masked it may have been.
So too though with the cartoon (and real people) fare for kids, that shows complete idiot adults and kids getting away with everything. Many of the Disney shows follow this pattern, and as I note, it is for parents to educate their kids as to the proper way to behave.
Yes, there is a lot to do and see, even in mass entertainment, but too much of it is still laced with sexual inuendo and violence of some sort. I’m certainly no Polly-Anna, and this post only goes to reinforce the notion that parents, not government, should be the censor of the entertainment one chooses to view and/or hear. The power of the purse is with parents in this regard, at least to a degree, and when studios force feed their crap and leave few alternatives (genre wise at least) people need to unplug. IMO, at least.
By Tom Baker on Jan 30, 2007 | Reply
Ken I agree, I also agree that most TV shows show the dad as a bumbling idiot and make men look stupid. But most of those shows show the kid “getting” away with it until the very end, when Mom or Dad bust them and they learn the consequence for their action.
But I agree with you for the most part, I just wanted to point out the other side - choice!
By Jimmy on Jan 30, 2007 | Reply
Great post Ken.
Just a quick thought- kids are targeted and cultivated to be consumers from the earliest age onward by the mass media.