Bring It On!

Stop the Celebrations

March 8th, 2007 | by Omnipotent Poobah |

The left’s post-Scootergate fist pumping has begun. They see this is a case of the elusive rule of law triumphant. However, comments by some trial participants intimate that while Scooter may be guilty, bigger fish wiggled free. That tantalizing observation is probably true - but like Fitz said - the investigation is over and unless Scooter decides to flip, that’s where things will end. Many will cry foul, but that’s how the law works, you’re innocent until proven guilty no matter how much smoke seems to be coming from your kitchen. That’s how it should be.

Although the fireworks and champagne are understandable, they miss an important point - we all lost.

The investigators presented charges not about the original crime, but for lying about it. These are surely serious felonies, but they pale in comparison to the alleged outing. Fitzgerald himself opined that the outcome leaves a cloud over the administration - unfortunately, only one of many in the Katrina-like swirl battering it - but this cloud is an especially dark one.

Gathering Clouds

The unanswered questions about the outing have some nasty blowback. They validate the idea that the politics of personal destruction is alive, well, and living large in Washington. As the saying goes, “absolute power corrupts absolutely”. In the Paris Hilton style, the powerful and famous often begin to believe their own propaganda. In the Big Dick’s case the me uber alles thinking goes a something like this: “I’m the good guy, so whatever I do to retain my power is completely justified. Might makes right.” Crushing your opponent with dubious charges to prove your personal and ideological superiority isn’t always illegal, but it is unfair.

Although I’m sure he’d rather become a democrat than admit it, Cheney’s behavior is not unlike Bill Clinton’s. Bill smeared several women to hide his inability to keep his dick in his pants. It happened so often his handlers had a name for it - “bimbo eruptions”. Bill would kiss, the victim would tell, and the smearing would begin. Bill repeated this cycle over and over, arrogantly believing his chickens would never come home to roost.

But then they did.

Bill’s Humidor Honey

Bill’s humidor honey - Monica Lewinsky - started doling out BJs like a politician hands out favors to cronies. As far as I know, BJs in the Oval Office are stupid, but not illegal. However, lying to grand juries is illegal and that’s clearly what Bill did. When caught in the lie, he accused his accusers of the politics of personal destruction - a pretty bold claim from one of the world’s top practitioners of that black art.

He didn’t go to trial because, as lies go, his were fairly small and didn’t much harm the nation except for a few jokes on late night TV and a cold shoulder from Hill. He did pay a price though - a pretty heavy one. He was impeached for his offenses, leaving a black stain on his administration for all time. I’d say that was a pretty fair punishment for a stupid crime even the prosecutors admitted would almost never go to trial in “the real world”.

Cheney hasn’t gone on trial at all, even though the prosecutor and a fair amount of evidence indicates he may have done more damage than any perky mouthful of Presidential penis. Just as Bill threw Monica under the bus with his, “I did not have sex with that woman” it looks like the Big Dick tossed Scooter out as his roadkill proxy. Let’s not quibble with Fitzgerald’s decision to forgo charges to Cheney. It was his decision to make, although he thought other forces may have been at work. However, in both the Clinton and Cheney cases, the stench of hubris hangs heavy in the air.

The Biggest Loss of All

Many will argue the damage in one of the cases far outweighs being relegated to the couch in the Presidential living quarters. In Cheney’s case, the damage may quite literally be incalculable. It would appear from the known evidence that Dick’s transgressions were far worse than Scooter’s, yet he lives to do battle another day. His hubris not only remains unchecked, but the trial has reinforced his belief in Vice Presidential infallibility. He figures that if some poor bastard has to take the fall for him, it’s all in the service of his - or the greater - good, whichever rationale fits.

The problem is, dear Dick, that isn’t true. And that sad fact is the biggest loss of all.

Cross Posted at The Omnipotent Poobah Speaks!
[tag]politics, plamegate, cheney, crapweasels, omnipotent+poobah, bring+it+on[/tag]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • e-mail
  • YahooMyWeb
Sphere: Related Content

  1. 7 Responses to “Stop the Celebrations”

  2. By manapp99 on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    “The investigators presented charges not about the original crime, but for lying about it. These are surely serious felonies, but they pale in comparison to the alleged outing”

    This is like saying the impeachment investigators presented charges for lying about a blow job and not about the rape of Anita Broderick. Lying under oath being a serious felony but pales in comparison to rape.

    If the outing is a more serious crime, why didn’t fitz charge Armitage who admits to it?

    As far as this line:

    “Cheney hasn’t gone on trial at all, even though the prosecutor and a fair amount of evidence indicates he may have done more damage than any perky mouthful of Presidential penis.”

    What evidence of what damage?

  3. By Ron on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    I am noticing that the verdict does have the Republicans more nervous than I expected. They’ve spent a good bit of time blowing this case off as a tempest in a teapot but now that Scooter is going down, they’re in full spin mode, trying to distract from what was an egregious abuse of government power and trying to hang people up on “but Joe Wilson lied!!!”

    I’m eager to see the extent of the blowback, but I’m not hoping for any miracles. I get the feeling the Republicans are overestimating the impact this is having on the public. Really, how much damage is it going to do to the solid 30% of morons who still support these criminals?

  4. By Ron on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    “Anita Broderick”

    Who?

  5. By manapp99 on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    Go to this link:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39ea902128fc.htm

    And you will see the letter Anita wrote to Hillary. Dateline did an interview with her late in the Clinton presidency. This story was buried by the MSM prior to the 92 election. I will try to find the dateline interview. Powerful stuff however just an allegation. Much like the Cheney is a criminal allegations.

    I am not worried at all about Scooter. He lied and now he has been tried. If he fails in appeal and goes to prision that is because he screwed up. If he lied to protect someone else he shouldn’t of. If he does not get a pardon, oh well. Politics at that level is hardball.

    It is interesting that you have not heard of the lady that claimed Bill raped her in Arkansas. Do you classify everyone that does not agree with you a moron?

  6. By Jersey McJones on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    The cons are stacking up their rationalizing excuses for the upcoming pardon of Libby.

    JMJ

  7. By manapp99 on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    JMJ, as I said I don’t care if is or isn’t pardoned. However there is plenty of precedent for one.

  8. By Ron on Mar 8, 2007 | Reply

    “It is interesting that you have not heard of the lady that claimed Bill raped her in Arkansas.”

     Her name is Juanita Broaddrick, and I know who she is. Little jokey-joke there.

Post a Comment