Bring It On!

Disability Doesn’t Stop Deployment

March 12th, 2007 | by Ken Grandlund |

The U.S. Army is apparently being guided by none other than the infamous Black Knight of Monty Python fame. That is, a recent report claims that soldiers previously classified as disabled are being reclassified and redeployed to Iraq despite their physical inabilities.

I can just hear the Black Knight now, as his arm is severed by King Arthur, proclaiming, “tis but a scratch!”

Or maybe this is just the latest example of how the Bush Administration has decided to ’support the troops.’

According to the article, soldiers whose disability is so bad as to prohibit them from even carrying the amount of weight that their body armor weighs are being sent back to Iraq anyhow, being told that they’ll be placed in ’safe jobs’ once in theater. Safe jobs? In Iraq? I didn’t know there were any safe jobs in Iraq.

One female soldier with psychiatric issues and a spine problem has been in the Army for nearly 20 years. “My [health] is deteriorating,” she said over dinner at a restaurant near Fort Benning. “My spine is separating. I can’t carry gear.” Her medical records include the note “unable to deploy overseas.” Her status was also reviewed on Feb. 15. And she has been ordered to Iraq this week.

I can’t tell if this action by the Army is due to the need to produce enough troops to satisfy the Bush Surge Plan or a way to keep troops out of Walter Reed Medical Center (and thus eliminate the need to treat them at all) but it’s dispicable just the same.

Who really cares if troops end up dying because they can’t carry armor, run and dive to evade incoming fire, or put other soldier’s lives in danger due to their own injuries? Certainly not the Bush Administration or the Bush Pentagon. But then, according to the Black Knight theory of battle injuries, all injuries are “just a flesh wound.”

[tag]Army+deploy+injured+troops, Iraq, military, Black+Knight, Monty+Python+Military, Bush, Salon.com[/tag]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • e-mail
  • YahooMyWeb
Sphere: Related Content

  1. 3 Responses to “Disability Doesn’t Stop Deployment”

  2. By L. Long on Mar 13, 2007 | Reply

    Question for ya.  Think this one through.

    In light of the WRAMC situation, do you think anyone in the Army Medical system would even consider this type of action?  And what Army Division would want to take that sort of potential liability into theater?

    Get a grip 

  3. By Charlie on Mar 13, 2007 | Reply

    Mr Long:

     There have been numeroust documented cases of veterans with PTSD being sent to the field repeatedly.  I am curently waiting to find out if my friend Cloy Richards is going to be sent with back with the Marines.  Just because the policy does not fit your narrow view of the war, does not make it any less true. 

     Get a clue.

    Charles E. Anderson

    HM2(FMF/SW) USN Ret

    OIF 1 Veteran

  4. By L. Long on Mar 14, 2007 | Reply

    Mr. Anderson

    I have nothing else to add; I don’t know your friends’ situation, I’m not judging your friend.  However, as one currently in theater, and seeing troops getting REFRAD because they physically cannot do the job, i repeat, get a grip.

    The SALON article didn’t address PTSD, it addressed phyhsical injuries.  Different issue, as you well know.

    Again, I’m currently in theater; don’t start that NEOCON BS. 

Post a Comment