Bring It On!

Some Things You Can Learn From “The Great Global Warming Swindle”

March 18th, 2007 | by steve |

1. Before you dismiss the video, watch it. Digest it. Compare. (I have read the science regarding Inconvenient Truth, now I want to see it after this…but for free)

2. As one of the Professors point out, when someone is making a claim about the truthiness of Global Warming, follow the money or who seems to gain from it. What other science right now can you gain from? The sex lives of duck-billed platypuses or the sex lives of duck-billed platypuses with/without global warming? You slap a pro or anti-global stance on something and someone is going to get the money to research it.

3. Why was this documentary free? Why was Gore’s pay per view?

4. If you dismissed an old friendship from high school because your friend did not follow Gore’s new world view, give that guy a call and say, “I am sorry for my attitude.” (This actually happened to me)

5. Why is the co-founder of Greenpeace part of this documentary and not Gore’s? How do you form one of the most extreme environmental groups on the planet and then turn your back on the supposed “mankind’s greatest challenge”?

6. Why is it the Gore supporters only have one world view?

7. I have been asked this many times about Inconvenient Truth, but can you refute the science in the above documentary? Cook up some popcorn and sit a spell.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • e-mail
  • YahooMyWeb
Sphere: Related Content

  1. 9 Responses to “Some Things You Can Learn From “The Great Global Warming Swindle””

  2. By Jersey McJones on Mar 18, 2007 | Reply

    1.  Fuck the “Swindle.”  I’ve seen a few parts of it and had to turn it off.  It’s like watching FOX News - you can only stomache so much bullshit in a single sitting.

    2.  If you follow the money and come up with something other than Big Oil, Big Industry, Big Agro, and the government and it’s contractors, first, than you’re a moron.

    3.  This was “free” because it was paid for by Channel Four and given free air time.  And…

    There was only one scientific advisor on the programme, Martin Livermore, whose sole scientific qualification is that he is the Director of a web-based think tank, The Scientific Alliance. The Alliance was set up by in 2001 by Robert Durward, the fiercely anti-green director of the British Aggregates Association, and Foresight Communications, a Westminster public relations and lobbying company, to “counter scare-mongering by the so-called green lobby”.

    4.  Then you’d be an idiot.

    5.  He turned his back on Greenpeace 20 years ago because he lost control of the originally Canada-based organization.

    6.  There is no science in this doc, just dismission.

    JMJ 

  3. By steve on Mar 18, 2007 | Reply

    Jersey, sometimes you are an ignorant buffoon.  Your arguments are futile.

    I clearly have an open mind regarding Global Warming.  I have stated many times on what I have done to correct the problem like, recycling, buying my furniture at IKEA who produces their own wood instead of cutting down our forests and I have upgraded my home’s heating and air conditioning system and got into fluorescent lighting.

    It’s pretty pathetic that you only submit to one position because Gore told you so.  How can you be so weak?  

    You are a real fucking idiot sometimes. 

    But we still love you.  :) 

  4. By Jersey McJones on Mar 18, 2007 | Reply

    I didn’t need Gore to tell me anything.

    And I love you too, Steve.  ;)
    JMJ

  5. By Dusty on Mar 18, 2007 | Reply

    Gores movie is now on cable..either HBO or Showtime..I do not remember which. I will watch it later steve..I was in a car accident yesterday(not my fault thank god) and I got a mean case of snidley whiplash.

    I do heart you steve, I have become quite fond of your conservative ass :) Thanks for posting the video sweetie. 

  6. By Dusty on Mar 19, 2007 | Reply

    The co-founder of GreenPeace is now a shill for the Nuclear Energy crowd btw. Until scientists can figure out what to do with the radioactive waste..besides making DU weapons..I personally don’t think nuke energy is a viable source. It takes an awful long time to become non radioactive, somewhere around 700 million years. 

  7. By Jersey McJones on Mar 19, 2007 | Reply

    I haven’t even seen the Gore film.  I’ll catch it whenever.  I read Scientific American, Discover and National Geographic.  Anyone who reads more than just steaming partisan crap-piles would know eneough about the issue to ignore the shit junk science of the “Swindle.”

    JMJ

  8. By christopher Radulich on Mar 19, 2007 | Reply

    I watched a part of your flix and can only say that it is amazing the lies in the first five minutes. It is well document that CO2 causes climate change. The effect of mankind on the weather started with the discovery of agriculture and the clearing of the forest and has accelerated with the advent of the industrial age.

  9. By christopher Radulich on Mar 19, 2007 | Reply

    I love the way they keep saying that we are irrelevent because of the small amount we contribute to the gasses. Well here is an experiment you can try. Fill a glass all the way to the top. Then take an eyedropped filled with water and drop a drop in the glass. The water will over flow the glass changing the equilibrium. The question is not the abosolute amount but what is needed to change the equlibrium.

  10. By christopher Radulich on Mar 19, 2007 | Reply

    Then they discuss how the sun is closely tied to our weather. What can be said beside DUH and what has that got to do with global warming arguement. The question again is whether we are tipping the scales

Post a Comment