Bring It On!

We will never see Cindy McCain’s tax returns.

May 9th, 2008 | by Dusty |

And interestingly enough, ALL of Johnny’s assets are shielded in Cindy’s name..

Therefore, we can not vet his assets or holdings or what “they” made from said holdings. He talks about transparency..and frankly, Johnny is full of shit on that one boys and girls.

Cindy is a rich little wife, and to be sure, that is a purely elitist move to keep your shit private like that.

Video filched from the CarpetBagger’s post on John and Cindy. Its Cindy telling us we will nevah evah see her tax returns.

So, after all the MSM whining about Hillary and Bill, the Kerry’s and those Obama kids…are they going to give this one a free pass?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • e-mail
  • YahooMyWeb
Sphere: Related Content

  1. 11 Responses to “We will never see Cindy McCain’s tax returns.”

  2. By rube cretin on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    i like the way she says no, no, no. Reminds me of a time in my much younger life. If you think Hillary has flaws, but think of this lady as first lady. “let them eat cake.” No wonder Mac called her a c… my friends, these people are so phony. Is this the class of the repug field?

  3. By Dusty on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    The class of it? Why of course it is! ;)

    And the press will whimper about this but nothing louder than that.

  4. By Dusty on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    Before you commence whining Lisa…your comment was deemed by moi as off-topic and inappropriate. Take your hatred somewhere else. ;)

    This is from the last link:
    Unlike Cindy McCain, Heinz Kerry did release what The New York Times reported on October 16, 2004, was a “two-page document” showing “total income of $5,073,554 last year” that enabled the Times to determine how much she had benefited from the Bush tax cuts, which John McCain supports extending permanently. An analysis of how the McCains have benefited from the tax cuts is not possible, based on the information his campaign has released on Cindy McCain’s income.

  5. By rube cretin on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    you should know that this moi thing or person is known for monitoring this site with a vengeance. Unacceptable posts are normally determined to be immoral and contain words not consistent with proper internet demeanor. If you want to talk dirty or suggest risky behavior please meet me over on my site.

  6. By Dusty on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    LMFAO Rube. You devil ;)

  7. By Lisa on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    Oh I get it. If someone disagrees with you it’s hateful and or racist I presume.

  8. By manapp99 on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    The difference is that Clinton and Obama file joint tax returns and therefore need to be disclosed. McCain files seperately and has for 28 years. This is due to Cindy being the heiress of a fortune and has a prenup with John going back 28 years. This inherited money is hers not Johns. You would think people advocating womens rights would applaud her keeping an identity seperate from her husbands. An independent woman who wanted to make sure her future husband loved her for her and not her money. She will make a wonderful first lady. Perhaps she can run for president after John’s 8 years.

    “You know, my husband and I have been married 28 years and we have filed separate tax returns for 28 years. This is a privacy issue. My husband is the candidate,” Cindy McCain, wife of Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting John McCain, said in an interview aired on NBC’s “Today” on Thursday”

    A woman has a right to privacy right?

  9. By Dusty on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    Manapp, the difference is that a Rethug isn’t held to the same standards. Everyone and their freaking mother demanded Ms. Kerry release her tax forms and she did..then the media and the Rethugs tore into her ‘earnings’ off the Bush tax cuts.

    Thing is…John Kerry was against those tax cuts unlike Weathervane McCain now.

    You simplify this and forget the major part of the Republican of you.

    Teresa Kerry tried to use the same excuse but no one was buying. The Rethug hypocritical dirtbags, including those in the MSM, never cease to amaze me.

  10. By Jersey McJones on May 9, 2008 | Reply

    That’s exactly right, Dusty. If a Dem was doing the same thing, the sleazy cons would be screaming bloody murder.


  11. By rube cretin on May 11, 2008 | Reply

    what do you know about DARWINSDOG?

  12. By Dusty on May 11, 2008 | Reply

    Nothing Rube.

Post a Comment