Gas Profits Not High Enough for Exxon
May 25th, 2008 | by Papamoka |Traveling the streets of your city and town and you see the prices at the pump proudly posted in big numbers at the curb where neighboring stations are almost always a penny difference per gallon in pricing. That would be simple competition at its basic form. Now travel five miles down the street where you just might see the same name brand gas station but the prices are higher or lower? Did the super tanker trailer truck from the same corporation come from a different distribution facility? Chances are that the same tanker truck delivered the exact same gasoline to both of the gas stations on the same day. Zipping over to the Washington Post you can see what Exxon thinks and how they treat their franchisees.
Peeved at Prices? Don’t Blame the Dealer
Awash in Profit, Exxon Fights for Pennies While Raising the RentBy Steven Mufson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, May 25, 2008; Page A01Now, however, Rezazadeh says she cannot stay in business. Credit-card fees are eating her profit margins. Exxon, which owns the station land, last week handed Rezazadeh a new lease raising her rent about 30 percent over the next three years. She stuck a copy on the window of her station to show customers who are angry about soaring pump prices. Rezazadeh has told Exxon that she cannot make money with the rent that high. Her territory manager’s reply, she said, was simple: When you go, leave us the keys. - Washington Post
One of the things I found interesting in this article is the manipulative factor that Exxon has built into its franchise agreement. Every facet of the business is dictated by the Big Oil company down to the exact location as to where you the consumer will grab your favorite candy bar from. That’s no different than being the owner of a Big Burger franchise. But the Big Burger franchise do not have different prices from neighborhood to neighborhood for the same burger and fries do they?
Then there is the mega corporation making ten billion in profits per quarter that manipulates it franchise owners to such a point that supposedly only an eight penny margin is allowed by the Exxon station owner. The only ones making a sizable and excess profit on gasoline at the pump is Exxon. That still isn’t enough cash flowing into Exxon so the stations where they own the land Exxon is allegedly pushing the rental or lease fees up thirty percent simply because they can. That would be similar to those old comedy skits starring Lilly Tomlin as a phone operator where she snorts at the customers complaint and simply states “We are the phone company sir, we can do whatever we want!”
One of the only assumptions you can get out of reading the article is that Exxon sees a bigger piece of the greed pie down at the local franchise level and is slowly pricing them out of business. When one station owner is told by the Exxon district manager to leave the keys for them when they are forced out of business then the writing and business plan is on the wall. Ten billion in profit is not enough for Exxon and they want more!
Pay attention Congress! It’s starting to look like the Exxon Mobil merger was a huge mistake and the all powerful corporation born of that merger has started to eat its young to get even fatter. Time to break out Teddy Roosevelt’s big stick and break up the mother ship.
Papamoka
Originally posted at Papamoka Straight Talk
Sphere: Related Content








7 Responses to “Gas Profits Not High Enough for Exxon”
By Chris Radulich on May 25, 2008 | Reply
It’s starting to look like the Exxon Mobil merger was a huge mistake and the all powerful corporation born of that merger has started to eat its young to get even fatter.
When was it ever a good idea? Business always yell about free enterprise and competition, but what they really mean is that they want to be a monopoly. One more thing to thank reagan for.
By rube cretin on May 26, 2008 | Reply
Damn i wish this situation was no worse than a bunch of greedy corporations. Sooner or later the reality of the peak oil situation is going to set in. Now is the time to begin preparations.
By manapp99 on May 26, 2008 | Reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exxon_Mobil
“Exxon Mobil Corporation or ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), is an American oil and gas corporation and a direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil company.[3] Formed on November 30, 1999, by the merger of Exxon and Mobil,”
Reagan wasn’t president in 1999. You can thank Clinton for this one.
By Chris Radulich on May 26, 2008 | Reply
I have little faith in our acting in a truely meaning full matter. When the Club of Rome published The Limits of Growth in 1972 they were not ignored. The were vilified.
By Chris Radulich on May 26, 2008 | Reply
Messed up on the link
http://www.energybulletin.net/1512.html
By Chris Radulich on May 26, 2008 | Reply
Limits of Growth
By Chris Radulich on May 27, 2008 | Reply
Enabling a corporate merger frenzy. The administration effectively re-wrote antitrust laws and oversaw what at the time was an unprecedented merger trend. “There is nothing written in the sky that says the world would not be a perfectly satisfactory place if there were only 100 companies, provided that each had 1 percent of every product and service market,”
said Reagan’s antitrust enforcement chief William Baxter.
Baxter says that he intends to rewrite the antitrust division’s 13-year-old guidelines on mergers in a way to permit more corporate couplings. He says he does not believe in putting more “weight in the saddlebags of the faster runners.” In other areas, the Reaganauts seem to be giving the green light to practices that have previously been regarded as anticompetitive, or nearly so.